DENPASAR, BALINEWS – Drs. Bramana Budianto, S.H., a representative of consumers of PT Satu Properti, has issued a public apology and clarification over a statement that went viral on social media linking PT Satu Properti to PT Reyland Property.
Speaking during a clarification session in Denpasar on Monday (October 19, 2026), Bramana emphasized that the two companies have no business relationship with one another.
Bramana acknowledged that his earlier statement suggesting a connection between the companies was based on an analysis of several sources, without first seeking direct confirmation from the management of PT Reyland Property.
He explained that he had made the statement while assisting several clients in addressing issues involving PT Satu Properti. After conducting further checks and communicating with the relevant parties, he said he recognized the need to correct the information to prevent misunderstandings and potential damage to the company's reputation.
“I would like to clarify the mistake in my previous statement, which may have gone viral. I also apologize for mentioning the company's name without conducting more thorough checks with the company itself,” Bramana said.
He extended his public apology to the management of PT Reyland Property and members of the public who had seen the information circulating on social media.
“I hereby clarify that, after conducting further checks and reviewing the relevant information, PT Satu Properti and PT Reyland Property have no corporate relationship with one another,” he stressed.
Handhi Yanna Putra, a representative of PT Reyland Property's management, also addressed the statement linking his company to PT Satu Properti.
Handhi reiterated that PT Reyland Property has no relationship with PT Satu Properti as previously suggested in Bramana's statement.
He urged all parties to exercise caution when making public statements, particularly those involving company names and alleged business relationships between corporate entities.
According to Handhi, fact-checking and direct confirmation with the parties concerned are essential before drawing conclusions or releasing information that could affect a company's reputation.
“We urge everyone to be more careful when sharing information or making public statements. Before concluding that one company has a relationship with another, the facts should first be checked and clarification sought from the parties concerned,” Handhi said.
He added that PT Reyland Property was prepared to provide explanations and present relevant documents, if necessary, to clarify the matter.
Handhi expressed hope that the clarification would help the public understand the situation accurately and prevent further misunderstandings that could harm the company's reputation.
Handhi revealed that the circulating information linking PT Reyland Property to PT Satu Properti had prompted questions from several clients who had previously conducted transactions with his company.
He said some clients had contacted the company to seek clarification about the reports and inquire about Reyland Property's current condition.
According to Handhi, the situation raised concerns and created negative perceptions that needed to be addressed promptly through direct communication.
“Many of our clients who have already conducted transactions with us have contacted the company to ask what is happening and about the condition of Reyland Property. That is why we felt it was necessary to issue this clarification to prevent misunderstandings,” he said.
To address these concerns, Handhi said the company was ready to meet clients who wanted further explanations.
He also invited clients who had conducted transactions with PT Reyland Property to visit the company's office for consultations and to obtain more detailed information directly from its representatives.
He expressed hope that this approach would help maintain good communication with clients and provide clarity based on information supplied directly by the company.
The clarification issued by Bramana Budianto and Handhi Yanna Putra was intended to address information circulating publicly about the alleged relationship between PT Satu Properti and PT Reyland Property.
Bramana acknowledged that he had made a mistake by issuing a statement before conducting comprehensive checks and seeking direct confirmation. Meanwhile, Handhi emphasized the importance of verifying information before associating two companies without a clear factual basis.
Both parties expressed hope that the clarification would resolve the misunderstanding and provide the public with more accurate information.
They also highlighted the importance of responsible communication and fact-checking, particularly when public statements involve business relationships and the reputations of companies.
